View Single Post
  #84  
Old January 6th 09, 07:47 AM posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.astro
Koobee Wublee
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 815
Default The Motion of the Perihelion of Mercury

On Jan 5, 11:33 pm, George Hammond wrote:
Koobee Wuble wrote:


It actually does not involve the Rieman curature tensor.


Nope... it actually does.


No, it does not. Show me where your God said so. shrug

As long as
the geometry approaches flat space at r = infinity, it is considered
asymptotically flat.


That's a tautology not a definition.


Hmmm... That is no tautology but a true description of what
“asymptotically flat” means. shrug

Both spacetimes I have described below satisfy
this criterion. shrug


Of course they do since they are both identically the
Schwarzchild Metric.


It proves you have flunked grade school mathematics. shrug

Shouldn't you be getting back to the shop?


After you.

** ds1^2 = c^2 (1 – K / r) dt^2 – dr^2 / (1 – K / r) – r^2 dO^2


** ds2^2 = c^2 dt^2 / (1 + K / r) – (1 + K / r) dr^2 – (r + K)^2 dO^2


I'll give you a clud Kooby....


From a candidate of mental patients, that is going to be interesting.

really smart people don't challenge Relativity....


Try “really stupid people are incapable of challenging relativities
(both SR and GR)”. shrug

they discuss how Relativity explains God,


Hmmm... Like yourself, a candidate for mental hospitals. shrug

even Einstein couldn't figure that out.


Of course not, Einstein was nobody. Einstein was a nitwit, a
plagiarist, and a lair. Why do you expect Einstein to figure out even
how to match a pair of socks. It would be way too challenging for a
nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar. shrug