Painius wrote,

These girls and boys are good.
Predictable, but damn good!

Yeah, it's the same predictable old routine every time. Inveterate,
unwavering VS'ers, they're totally preoccupied with DMP (details,
minutiae and particulars) and see no meaning or relevance to 'big
picture' issues like the SHQ (super/hypernova, quasar) 'Litmus Test' for
theories of gravity.
One of 'em keeps yelping about why a gravitationally
accelerated, charged particle doesn't emit a photon (presumably in
contrast to its emitting a photon if *electromagnetically* accelerated).
But since to him/her there is "no medium", there is no answer and the
question remains a conundrum.
But if there *IS* a medium, and if gravity is the effect of
a smoothly-accelerating spaceflow, and if electromagnetism is the effect
of a *spin component* to a spaceflow (as it is under the CBB model), the
photon is emitted as the result of the particle's interaction with the
field's *spin component*.
But nothin' but nothin' is ever going to change their "no
medium" worldview. Anymore, whenever these hardline VS'ers weigh in and
start harping on their DMP and dismissing the 'Litmus Test', i know
better than to attempt any further discourse with 'em. Not worth the
aggrimavation.
They seem to think somebody's trying to "convince" them of
something, which i sure as hell ain't. I know that's impossible. So i
just slushpile 'em out of hand.
You on the other hand, appear to enjoy endlessly
harrangin' with 'em.