View Single Post
  #20  
Old December 20th 08, 04:34 AM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique,sci.astro
xxein[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 33
Default Relativity is predictive And fully complete, sans randomness.

On Dec 19, 11:58 am, Jeff$B"%(BRelf wrote:
Unlike Einstein's Relativity,
Quantum Mechanics is just a bundle of statistics from heaps of data
-- it's predictive, but semi-random, incomplete.
Relativity is predictive And fully complete, sans randomness.

Perhaps objects vibrate faster at lower altitudes,
thus warping spacetime -- and our simple/3-D minds model it as a force.

When a muon from a cosmic ray -- moving near the speed of light --
hits you, its momentum is very real, not " notional ".
In fact, it'd have infinite momentum, if it could move at c.

Likewise, its slower tick-rate is real, not notional.

Muons are natural clocks -- we know how long they live --
and we know that -- to us humans -- they live longer when
moving near the speed of light.


xxein: What would change their speed? Nothing of/to within their own
environment.

Would you like to say that they had a sub-light speed and that our
gravity increased it thus increasing their longevity?

You would be so wrong. The fact is that we measure a position wrt
time. We do so under the same/similar gravity.

It's too long to explain. Sorry I bothered you.

Confusing? Yes it is unless you understand what gravity is.