View Single Post
  #9  
Old December 16th 08, 02:32 PM posted to sci.space.history
Jeff Findley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,012
Default Comparison of Delta IV, Aries 1 and Atlas V


"M" wrote in message
...
On Dec 15, 1:33 pm, "Jeff Findley"
wrote:
"M" wrote in message

...

Where can I go for a web page that has a direct comparison of the

Aries 1 payload capability versus the Delta iV Heavy and the Altas V?

It's hard to compare the two since they have completely different
missions.
That said, I think NASA's ESAS report looked at them. But people have
been
complaining that this report lacks some of the detils which are
contained in
(missing) appendices:

http://www.nasa.gov/directorates/esm...AS_report.html

I think you want:

Part 6: Launch Vehicles and Earth Departure Stages (6.5 Mb PDF)


Thanks, that is perfect. Just what I was looking for.


Please be aware that this is the "bait" Ares I of the "bait and switch"
which Griffin pulled on all of us. For Ares I, ESAS assumed a four segment
SRB topped with an air started SSME powered upper stage. This has been
replaced with a five segment SRB topped with a much less efficient J-2X
powered upper stage. Performance of Ares I has suffered as its development
has progressed.

Also, I would not trust all of the EELV information in there. It's dated,
at the least.

Jeff
--
"Many things that were acceptable in 1958 are no longer acceptable today.
My own standards have changed too." -- Freeman Dyson