
February 2nd 04, 04:39 AM
|
|
GEORGE BUSH'S CARLYLE NOW CONTROLS NASA/LOCKHEED
On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 04:27:34 GMT, "Clif Davis" wrote:
And your point is what? You still haven't said anything about how you would
fix the problem.
There is no fix.
Your singlemindlessness shows so much lack of thought. I really wish you
could try harder. But I know that is asking to much.
Your problem is not my problem. Fix it yourself.
"*" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 04:12:37 GMT, "Clif Davis" wrote:
hey nosespam.... and tell us how you would fix the problem. Who would do
the
work NASA does? Come one here, be a positive influence for a change.
I'm only responding to promote the header.
You do know that Carlyle has controlling interest in Lockheed and Lockheed
is NASA and the NSA and Echelon. Bush Sr. has a lock on the world right
now.
And it was Bush Sr. who wanted to be world dictator too, and he's
suceeded.
"*" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 03:22:35 GMT, "Clif Davis"
wrote:
Reposting the same stuff from no-name slobs, one doesn't make it true
or,
two, doesn't make it a bad thing.
I wish the sissies at NASA would WAKE UP and smell the coffee! NASA
scientists are being manipulated by special interest agendas because
Bush
Sr's Carlyle now has controlling intrest in interest! (and Echelon)
NASA is in complete conflict of interest with the United States
Government.
"*" wrote in message
.. .
http://www.petroleumnews.com/pnarch/010228-49.html
NASA Ames Center looks at problem of drilling on Mars
Kristen Nelson
PNA Editor-in-Chief
If there is life on Mars, it would probably be microorganisms in
water
deep
below the surface of the planet. Dr. Geoffrey Briggs, director,
Center
for
Mars Exploration at the NASA Ames Center, told "Meet Alaska" that
NASA
is
looking at ways to drill on Mars to look for water - and the life it
might
contain.
Briggs said NASA has been working with Halliburton, Shell,
Baker-Hughes
and
the Los Alamos National Laboratory to identify drilling technologies
that
might work on Mars.
The first goal, he said, would be "to drill a hole down into the
permafrost,
maybe 100 meters as a trial of the technology; ultimately we want to
go
to
several kilometers."
The earliest drilling opportunity would be 2007, and one of the
problems
will be power. A very power-efficient system might cut out cores a
meter
at
a time, Briggs said, perhaps grinding away at material needed to get
the
core at a rate of one core a day for hundreds of days.
Deeper drilling, into the multi-kilometer range, might occur as part
of
a
2014 Mars mission which would put astronauts on the planet to
assist.
Los Alamos developed a melting tool intended for use in
high-technical
geothermal drilling, he said, and that's one of the things NASA is
looking
at. The melting tool would also "tend to sterilize the hole on the
way
down"
which would help with the problem of contamination issues.
Halliburton and Baker-Hughes are working on some very advanced
systems,
Briggs said, some so advanced they aren't willing to talk much about
them.
He said the NASA Ames Center relies on working with people in the
industry
who "really understand the problems and make us face up to the
realities .
"We do appreciate," he said, "that this is a non-trivial activity."
And as a side note: There's be no reason to expect oil on Mars if
NASA
didn't have prior undisclosed knowledge that Mars once had abundant
planet
and animal life.
NASA is lying to the public big time.
|