Thread
:
Is htv risky?
View Single Post
#
4
December 8th 08, 08:53 AM posted to sci.space.station
Brian Gaff
external usenet poster
Posts: 2,312
Is htv risky?
At least one of the cameras recently fitted was for viewing htv, as was the
gps aerial.
I gather the berthing pport will indeed be one of the bigger ports on the
nodes which have no auto docking hardware of course.
As for distance, I don't know, how much reach has the arm if sited at the
right place?
I still get the shivers but hopefully someone has actually mitigated the
risks.
Brian
--
Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email.
graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them
Email:
__________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ __________
"John Doe" wrote in message
...
wrote:
All those failure modes and more can happen just as easily with
Progress, Soyuz or ATV. The HTV and future spaceraft like SpaceX's
Dragon only need to approach with the grapple range area of the SSRMS,
and hold still rather than continue to close in order to accompish a
docking.
Does it really reduce flight software complexity ? Seems to me that you
still need precise guidance, ability to stop and station keep (more so
with HTV since it will need to station keep very close to the station.
Where would HTV berth ? And how far from its berthing point will it
need to station keep for the arm to go and grapple it ? couple of metres
? 10 metres ?
ATV/Soyuz/Progress use "targets" on the station to get Kurs to guide
their approach. Does the USA side have ay such targets to allow HTV to
guide itself to proper location an orientation to be grappled ?
Brian Gaff
View Public Profile
View message headers
Find all posts by Brian Gaff
Find all threads started by Brian Gaff