Mutts wrote:

Years of declining NASA budgets under the Clinton administration and
NASA used as a political tool (GoreSat nonsense, gobs of money spent bailing
out he russian space program, messing with environmentally safe foam instead of
one that works better, etc).
Doesnt this deserve more attention? The report certainly considers
the budget a major factor. Seems to me Clinton/Gore failed NASA.
What do you think?

According to the CAIB report, the backsliding to the same old
bureaucratic inertia started within a few years after the first damning
report was issued on the Challenger disaster.

By the time Clinton became President in 1993, NASA was pretty much back
to business as usual.


--
Steven D. Litvintchouk
Email:

Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.