On Oct 26, 12:57*am, "Curtis Croulet"
wrote:
the unique rotational orientation

a.k.a. "tilt"
--
Curtis Croulet
Temecula, California
33°27'59"N, 117°05'53"W

Comparisons between the rotational orientation of Uranus and Earth
clearly demonstrate that this fixed inclination does not generate the
seasons but only alters the way the seasons are experienced in the
respective hemispheres either side of the Equator while at the Equator
no seasonal differences occur for either planet,at least in the barest
seasonal terms of daylight/darkness.

Have you got that clear ?,axial tilt does not cause the seasons,the
specific way a planet orbits the central Sun with an intrinsic 360
degree motion with respect to the central Sun causes hemispherical
variations in daylight/darkness when allied with daily rotation.

If any institution involved with climate studies is prepared to ignore
rotational orientation (tilt) in context of the seasons and the
addition of a new orbital component over and above the motion of a
planet around the central star then nothing productive will be
achieved and much damage done.While it is incontrovertible that 'tilt'
is a factor in the seasons,its role is restricted to the degree of
variations for different latitudes excluding the Equator while the
actual dynamic is found in the orbital specifics.I will genuinely be
surprised if distinguished and highly productive meteorological
services remain with the current explanation for the seasons based on
variable 'axial tilt' where the Earth magically straightens up at the
Equinox -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=taHTA7S_JGk

Again,it is up to institutions to figure this one out and I do admit
the specifics arising from the astronomical causes of the seasons can
be easily overlooked and insofar as this is quite a large
modification in replacing 'axial tilt' as the cause of the seasons,I
am prepared to park my interest in the topic in order to give this
topic the room it deserves.Shame nobody here in this forum has picked
up on it but that sometimes happens .