View Single Post
  #14  
Old October 19th 08, 05:49 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Painius Painius is offline
Banned
 
First recorded activity by SpaceBanter: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,144
Default Big bang and black hole.

"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote...
in message ...

Double A Fabric of space is very strong,but gravity is stronger
TreBert


TB, you're not seriously meaning that you think there
are such things as "singularities", are you? I mean,
how can "infinite mass" fit into "zero volume"?

Okay, i get that neutron stars are compressed matter,
so compressed that the atoms have sort of been
"squished" and the matter of the star is mostly just
neutrons. And i get that neutrons pack a whole lot of
mass into a very small volume. And i also get that a
black hole compresses even more mass than a neutron
star into an even smaller volume.

But i don't get an infinite mass compressed into a zero
volume (singularity). For me, it's one of the things that
ruins the BB theories.

I have toyed with the idea of a photon being an infinite
mass compressed into a zero volume, which would be
why we can only sense it as an itty bitty quantum, a
particle-like wave that usually moves real fast. But no,
it's just too much of a stretch for me.

My idea of mass is that it must always, by nature, take
up some volume. It always has a limited (never infinite)
nature. And while i can visualize a "zero volume", i find
it very hard picturing it being filled with anything. Just
don't make sense to me.

happy days and...
starry starry nights!

--
Indelibly yours,
Paine Ellsworth

P.S. "The belief that there is only one truth, and
that oneself is in possession of it, is the root
of all evil in the world."
Max Born, quantum physicist, and

Olivia Newton John's grandfather!

P.P.S.: http://yummycake.secretsgolden.com
http://garden-of-ebooks.blogspot.com
http://painellsworth.net