View Single Post
  #2  
Old January 10th 04, 03:54 AM
Harry Conover
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default uranium on Moon and Mars; USA president supporting a station on Moon and human landing on Mars

(Archimedes Plutonium) wrote in message . com...
This is good but unexpected from the antiScience president of Mr.
Bush. One of the reasons I feel that Mr. Dean would make a nice new
president because he has the background and education and *logic*
because he is a trained medical doctor. The very best leaders of the
USA had a large background in science-- Jefferson, Franklin, Hamilton
and if not for the science background of leaders of the USA then the
USA would not now be the superpower.

Too many of the recent presidents to the USA were weak in science and
this is a horrible pitfall. I have proposed that any president must
have a level of Science background and if not, disqualified from ever
becoming the president.

And it is a shame that few Medical doctors have become president of
the USA and that too many lawyers and celebrities and people who have
had little contact with Science and Logic. So I think the time is ripe
that the president of the USA have a good and large background of
Science and Logic.


Wow, Archimedes Plutonium has just endorsed Dean (not that Dean is not
getting enough daily increasing problems).

My take on Dean is that he is yet another "Plastic Man" politician,
who is for anything your are for and against anything you are agains,
parameters that he finds adjustable for the specific group to which he
is currently speaking.
My guest is that Dean will be long gone from the frontrunners, far
before the convention.

I'll admit to being a conservative voter, but not a declared party
member. From my perspective, Lieberman is the democrat's sole viable
contender in a national race, and the only democrate that I would
consider voting for if I decide to abandon Bush. I don't think that
the democrats are going to give me that choice.

Frankly, I believe that the democratic convention is going to nominate
Hillary Rodham Clinton as their candidate, unblievable as that may now
sound. She will bring nothing to the table in the way of either
experience or accomplishments, but her candidacy will secure a
landslide victory for George W. Bush!

You can pummel me if I'm wrong on this one, but there is a damn good
reason why Ms Clinton is not missing up on even a single photo op!
Why? :-)

Harry C.