View Single Post
  #1  
Old January 8th 04, 05:23 AM
ralph sansbury
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default new water on Mars theory

I looked briefly at your paper and will look it more closely
later but my first thought was that these added forces are
regarded as "apparent". My second thought was that the spin and
orbital movements of planets etc could produce forces insided the
moving matter like charge polarization transverse to the spin and
orbital movements inside protons and neutrons etc.. And that this
would produce changes in the "gravitational" force of the moving
matter.
Will take a closer look at your interesting paper later.

"Bill Clark" wrote in message
om...
I realize that quite a bit of water has been found on Mars

integrated
into the polar ice caps and under the surface in many areas.

However,
I think the idea of masssive oceans of water having existed on

Mars
for millions of years - enough to have caused the continent

sized
canyons and other dramatic surface features - has some flaws.

Mars is such a small planet that it cannot keep more than a

super thin
atmosphere. It's so thin that winds hundreds of miles an hour

feel
only like slight breeze. This tepid atmosphere is constantly

lost to
space because the gravity is so small. If man ever colonizes

Mars an
artificial atmosphere will have to be created but it will have

to be
constantly replinished to replace what is lost to space.

If free flowing surface water ever existed on Mars then it

would
quickly evaporate into the atmosphere, and soon thereafter be

lost to
space. It is simply not possible for oceans of water to have

existed
there for millions of years. The problem then is to explain

what
could have caused the surface features, if not water. I

believe it
was a subtle aspect of gravity, and I have the complete theory

on my
website at http://home.austin.rr.com/whcii/

I know many scientists will be horrified by this theory of

mine, but
I believe it is at least as plausible as theirs about oceans of

water.
Until solid evidence is found of huge, massive quantities of

water
having existed on Mars, then my theory must be accepted as a

possible
alternative.

Bill Clark