....
Do you know what fire is?

What is up about as high as your ass right now.

All your words, your so called explanations, explain nothing at at.

They do to an open mind. If I provided links to basic knowledge sources,
would you follow them. You seem to have formed opinions prior to exposure
to any knowledge source.

eg: what is magnetism, charge and length contraction.
What is charge? magic. It does not exist. What is it?
spooky action at adistance? Some instantaneous magic?

It is what keeps gives us structure. It is what causes a bimorph to shange
shape. It is what moelcules use as cement. But you were in denial about
neutrons. No need to change the subject to charge, because teh neutron has
no net charge.


Regardless. You are trying to prop up a model that everyone knows
is old and worn out.

Technology has has moved ahead exponentially and new discoveries
have shown that many of the beliefs of the past, were incorrect.

Some people insist on wasting money trying to chase rainbows
based on predictions made with a model that has been proven to
be less than adequate. And that is putting it mildly.

Bigger particle colliders are not the answer. There is nothing
to be gained, by blasting em waves into each other and watching
them make curls in a detector. Then calling them particles.

The only thing, the standard model seems to do, is confuse
people to the degree, that they will not try to experiment
on their own. And probably they shouldn't given the dangers
involved.

No Higgs Bosun, no gravity waves, no gravitons, etc. etc etc

When confronted with something like the Hutchison Effect,
the standard model is completely unable to describe it.

Does that mean it doesn't exist?

You know how hard they tried and tried to disprove it?

You will see physicists, watching a TV monitor, and saying,
I don't know, it could be real, but then I am not sure the
videos aren't fake, so I don't know.

And that aired on TV.

Did they know, he has some 1000 hours of film footage and was
funded by Boeing for years, and has worked with physicists
from several countries and has had hundreds of people
witness the effect first hand? Inlcuding representatives
from the American military and Canadaian military,
and it is all documented? Not to mention the metal
samples, which prove beyond any shadow of a doubt the effect
is real.

Yet physicists were not able to say what it was at all.

How is it, that metal, can turn transparent? Where is your
neutrinos?

How is it, that wood, can become embedded in metal
or welded to metal, and not burn?

I could go on and on, but in the end, people merely make
their own minds up. If it is public funds, they don't
mind chasing rainbows. But you will never get private
money to chase rainbows based on a physics model,
which says it is impossible.


And the Hutchison Effect is merely one process not understood,
by the standard model, and for good reason.
People would be making gold.
http://www.americanantigravity.com/hutchison.html

Same with zero point energy. As long as people are chasing
hadrons and gluons, the oil can flow and the coal fires
will be kept burning.


We were running buses in Vancouver on the Ballard fuel cell,
and it 3as listed on the stock exchange, and people were
still saying that that technology didn't exist.

Check out the buses in Holland...
http://www.rnw.nl/science/html/031215wheel.html

Still burning diesel. When they could run on alchohol.

-*-