On Aug 7, 2:00*pm, PD wrote:
On Aug 7, 4:30*am, Pentcho Valev wrote:

On Aug 7, 11:11*am, "Dirk Van de moortel" dirkvandemoor...@ThankS-NO-

SperM.hotmail.com wrote:
Pentcho Valev wrote in message

*

On Aug 7, 2:35 am, PD wrote:
On Aug 6, 5:48 pm, Pentcho Valev wrote:
Clever Draper you have never been so confused (or dishonest). The
proper context of Einstein's both equations c'=c(1+V/c^2) and
c'=c(1+2V/c^2) is the Pound-Rebka experiment, and this was clearly
stated (see above).

Citations, please. Were both in the Pound-Rebka paper?

No citations.
Honestly, what did you expect?

Dirk Vdm

But I have already drawn the conclusion, Clever Moortel. Let me
repeat: Einstein's equations c'=c(1+V/c^2) and c'=c(1+2V/c^2)

Einstein's equations from WHERE? What is the context of those
equations?

Zombie knows no limits. Up until recently, Clever Draper, I was
accused, by your brothers zombies, of being OBSESSED with Einstein's
1911 equation c'=c(1+V/c^2) since I had referred to it countless times
indeed. Some time ago I discussed and gave references to the other
equation, c'=c(1+2V/c^2), as well:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...76de9c1bb81ab?

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...196c607f78bd9?

And now you zombie Draper want to convince the public that you see
Einstein's equations for the first time. Bravo zombie Draper! The
public is convinced!

Pentcho Valev