On Aug 7, 11:11*am, "Dirk Van de moortel" dirkvandemoor...@ThankS-NO-
SperM.hotmail.com wrote:
Pentcho Valev wrote in message

*

On Aug 7, 2:35 am, PD wrote:
On Aug 6, 5:48 pm, Pentcho Valev wrote:
Clever Draper you have never been so confused (or dishonest). The
proper context of Einstein's both equations c'=c(1+V/c^2) and
c'=c(1+2V/c^2) is the Pound-Rebka experiment, and this was clearly
stated (see above).

Citations, please. Were both in the Pound-Rebka paper?

No citations.
Honestly, what did you expect?

Dirk Vdm

But I have already drawn the conclusion, Clever Moortel. Let me
repeat: Einstein's equations c'=c(1+V/c^2) and c'=c(1+2V/c^2) showing
how the speed of light varies with the gravitational potential were
NOT mentioned in the Pound-Rebka paper which confirmed the validity of
the equation f'=f(1+V/c^2) showing how the frequency varies with the
gravitational potential. For that reason my question: "Which of
Einstein's equations is consistent with the equation f'=f(1+V/c^2)?"
is absolutely irrelevant. Conclusion:

"YES WE ALL BELIEVE IN RELATIVITY, RELATIVITY, RELATIVITY"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PkLLXhONvQ

"DIVINE EINSTEIN"
http://www.bnl.gov/community/Tours/E.../Einsteine.jpg
http://www.haverford.edu/physics-astro/songs/divine.htm
http://www.physicstoday.org/vol-58/i...e_einstein.mp3

Pentcho Valev