On Aug 6, 7:31*pm, PD wrote:
On Aug 6, 12:27*pm, Pentcho Valev wrote:

On Aug 6, 6:56*pm, PD wrote:

There is never "too far". Nature is what it is, as shown in
experiment. If nature is very, very strange, then that's what it is.

You are Absolutely Correct again, Clever Draper. For instance nature
says, through the Pound-Rebka experiment, that the gravitational
frequency shift is:

f' = f(1 + V/c^2)

and that's what it is isn't it Clever Draper. On the other hand Divine
Albert gives two equations for the variation of the speed of light in
a gravitational field:

(A) c' = c(1 + V/c^2)

(B) c' = c(1 + 2V/c^2)

Which equation Clever Draper - (A) or (B) - is consistent with the
gravitational frequency shift equation? Is the inconsistent one wrong?
Einstein zombie world is constantly singing "Divine Einstein" and does
not give a **** about both (A) and (B) *but I have the impression that
you are not a typical zombie and CAN answer the questions. So?

So, what's the deal, Pentcho? Are you asking me to try and teach you
so that it DOES make sense to you? Are you asking me to help you
reconcile your common sense to what nature really does? Are you trying
to get a free education on the internet?

Typical zombie. But don't worry - even your masters are not allowed to
comment on this. This is the Achilles’s heel of Divine Albert's Divine
Theory.

Pentcho Valev