On 4 Aug, 17:52, Pentcho Valev wrote:
On Aug 4, 5:20*pm, dlzc wrote:

Dear Ian Parker:

On Aug 4, 4:27*am, Ian Parker wrote:
...

And what does H.D.Retic say about all this?
The theories of La Reta work even less well.

I don't know about H.D. Retic, but...
H.E.Retic (heretic) - EinsteinHoax - Ernest Wittke
... says whetever he can about the Jew-boy.

David A. Smith

Which is more important: that John Baez, Einsteiniana's Great
Educator, abandoned quantum gravity because he thinks that theoretical
physics is "schizophrenic" and "junk", or that part of the information
comes from a possibly anti-semitic source? Similarly, Einsteiniana's
literature tells you almost nothing about the way Einstein dealt with
the variability of the speed of light in a gravitational field -
perhaps the most dangerous episode in Einsteiniana's history. So when
a Muslim website is the only place where you can find the details, it
is worth seeing:

http://www.speed-light.info/speed_of_light_12000.htm

Loop quantum theory which is what John Baez is investigating is
incredible difficult. I don't know why you lot respond with whoops of
joy. The fact of the matter is that the theories of La Reta do not
achieve anything.

I think it is important fore readers to know the anatomy of La Reta,
the Vrill aircraft that never were. How we have been strung along for
over 60 years on antigravity. How Area 51 and Roswell perpetrated a
colosal fraud.

John has never

1) Claimed aircraft of stupendous performance existed that did not.
2) Used little green men and alien abduction as a cover story.
3) Persistently tried to disinform all of us.

I have always said that anti Relativity was the tip of an iceberg. The
readership should realize this.

John, as I uderstand is attempting to derive a Theory of Everything
from Lie Algebra. He is presenting the Lorenz Group as local
incariance.

If he now says he was wrong and can't do it I admire him for his
honesty. This is considerably more than we have ever got out of
Roswell.


- Ian Parker