"ceniza" wrote in message
...
|
| Nice site for NASA Apollogists.

I'm disappointed. All you can do is invoke the standard conspiracy theory
cop-out: "Gee, it must be a NASA disinformation site." I don't work for
NASA. Never have, probably never will. It may surprise you that you don't
have to work for NASA to be an expert in space engineering.

So instead of doing the same old elaborate dance away from those
embarrassing facts that tend to quickly and decisively trump the extreme
ignorance of the conspiracy theories, why don't you take them head on? If
my site is mere NASA disinformation then it would have to be factually or
logically incorrect. And if it's factually incorrect -- for whatever reason
or motive -- then you should be able to point out exactly the spots where
it's wrong. Can you do that? Or is name-calling the only thing you know?

--
|
The universe is not required to conform | Jay Windley
to the expectations of the ignorant. | webmaster @ clavius.org