Jonathan Silverlight wrote in message ...
[...]
Maybe I'm the _only_ person who freely voices that the Pioneer effect
is
an excess red shift - and the only person who thinks [..] that the residual
represents an
accumulated value, corresponding to the 10 1/2 years of light travel
time!
And it equals to the theoretical Hubble wavelength doubling time
constant
of 4.2 billion years or in linear approximation, for small distances
corresponds to a 'conventional' Hubble constant of 162 km/s per Mpc...
And please, Johnathan, allow me to formulate my position!
Sorry, but we've been here far too many times before. You can't equate
light travel time to the "arc" during which Anderson et al. collected
data.
You pointed to the key of the problem! The bigbangology tends to
forget
the fact that the so called anomalous acceleration is the unexplained
portion of FREQUENCY SHIFT - (recalculated to Doppler velocity, hence
cm/s or m/s) - divided by the DISTANCE of photon travel - (measured in
light seconds)! We been here so many times, but somehow you tend to
forget - or intentionally misrepresent - the facts!
And even if you could, your figure for the Hubble constant is
ridiculous. How do you explain the fact that it is more than twice the
various independent measurements? It doesn't even bear any relationship
to the anomalous acceleration.
First of all, what you call 'measurements' - they are closer to
regilion
then to physics... Actually, there is only one factor which defines
the
alleged around H=70 km/s per Mpc value: the alleged similarity
of Supernovae. I would say it is ridiculous. Secondly: my Hd=4.1167
billion years (need this correction!) results in a very interesting
pictu the look-alike galaxies are the same sizes! I would say - it
is
an important proof of the correctness of my about H=160 km/s per Mpc -
equivalent theoretical value for the photon energy loss rate.
Indeed, the reported anomaly - frequency drift vs. distance - is the
Hubble redshift vs. distance law, and indeed it could be viewed as a
dedicated experiment to verify or falsify the tired light cause!
Sorry, but it put the last nails into the coffin of big bang hoax...
Cheers!
Aladar
http://www.stolmarphysics.com