Science Supports Creation
"Vizard" wrote in message
news:q%oGj.8858$Oj5.7237@trnddc06...
As readers of these threads know, there is a wealth of scientific evidence
for creation. The weight of such evidence has moved many leading
scientists of the 20th century to speak publicly of creation and a
Creator. Among these have been William T. Kelvin, Dmitri Mendeleev, Robert
A. Millikan, Arthur H. Compton, Paul Dirac, George Gamov, Warren Weaver
and Wernher von Braun, to name some.
Cosmological arguments for creation have been mustered by Robert Jastrow
in his book God and the Astronomers. Speaking of the big bang theory of
the origin of the universe, many scientists have freely used the word
“creation.” Even scientists whose personal predilections are against the
idea of creation reluctantly confess that the convincing nature of the
evidence leaves them wondering.
Why do you think this is a confirmation of the Bibical statement:
"In the beginning..."? The only point you can make of this brief
text is that after the Big Bang Science and religion both are in
agreement on one point. There was a beginning.
|