"ralph sansbury" wrote in message ...
----- Original Message -----
From: "luke"
Newsgroups: sci.astro,sci.physics.relativity
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 11:11 AM
Subject: Solar Eruption and Electrostatic Gravity


"ralph sansbury" wrote in message
...
[snip]

I assume that the spinning and orbiting motion of planets
and
moons and suns is associated with charge polarization in
their
nuclei transverse to these motions and that the attractions
in a
radial direction account for the gravitational force of these
objects.


Well then how do you account for the Cavendish experiment
results?

The horizontal projection or the radial force as mentioned in
the part
you snipped
see also www.bestweb.net/~sansbury



Am I to understand that in your theory the cavendish force is directly
proportional to the spin of the Earth? So a Cavendish experiment
performed in an intertial frame would yield a null result?

Sorry if I didn't read your material thoroughly but I imagine you
would have interesting things to say about the mass and density of
Mars as it has a much smaller rotation rate..

To be more general the currently formulated orbital mechanics works
for a central force and is independent of angular momentum.. wouldn't
a theory such as yours destroy this symmetry and change the orbit
equation? For example an elliptical orbit has more centrifugal force
at perihelion, and so should have stronger dipole moments, and more
gravity than 1/r^2..



The proposed polarization of charge in atomic nuclei and
electrons and mesons etc overlaps the concept of spin.
And so perhaps also the attempted explanation of forces as
being associated with and determined in some mystical way by the
exchange of photons or short lived charged particles in CERN
'pictures'
of collisions of protons etc.
So the gravitational field may be due to radially oriented
electrostatic dipoles. This would explain the radial
attraction of objects toward the center of the earth and of
objects as in Cavendish's experiment. In the latter case the
horizontal force between the objects may be the projection of the
radial force in the horizontal direction.
(see www.bestweb.net/~sansbury)