"The_Sage" wrote in message
...
Reply to article by: Ed Conrad
Date written: Sun, 02 Nov 2003 15:46:54 GMT


Some years ago, a research team tested a block from
one of the Pyramids and ws able to provide the physical evidence
that it indeed had been poured, same as all the others.

Name that research team so we can verify your source or prove you are an
incredibly liar.

The Sage

================================================== ===========
My Home Page : http://members.cox.net/the.sage

"The biggest problem in the world, could have been solved
when it was small..." -- Lao Tzu
================================================== ===========

The fact of the matter is that the Great Pyramids of Giza were built out of
the very limestone on which those structures rest. The limestone came from
a quarry located behind the complex, and was only discovered when a "real"
geologist decided to study the plateau on which the pyramids were built. He
found the quarry behind the pyramids, filled with the debris from the ramp.
That debris originated in the quarry operations, and was used to make the
ramp on which the stones were moved into place. Once the pyramids were
completed, the debris from the ramp was pushed back into the quarry, nearly
filling it. Incomplete stones have been found in the quarry, along with the
tools that were used to make them.

The fact that most researchers have missed this is not surprising since they
never looked for it, unitl now.

http://www.cnn.com/WORLD/9608/11/egypt.pyramids/

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/pyramid.../builders.html

http://www.science-frontiers.com/sf094/sf094a01.htm