In sci.astro The_Sage wrote:

In other words, it wasn't "research", it was a New Age study and
it didn't prove anything other than Ed is an incredible liar.

No, it wasn't "new age" but work by reputable researchers. which
only makes you the incredible liar ('nother word for "debunker")

Anti-gravity cannot be used to explain how the stones were cut,
only how they were transported.

Please clean the stone dust from your ears. Transported and
then fitted. Fitted is not the same as "cut". "Cut" is the
pseudo-science presumtion! One cuts them out of the quarry,
you transport them, then fit them in place.

What's so difficult about making precise stone cuts in soft limestone?

I take this as proof that you've never actually seen a Cyclopean
wall? What other things are you a "sage" on that you've never
actually seen?

All the "odd angles" had to be calculated and then a rough cut made to extract
the stone. The finishing could be done in place at the installation site as all
hand-made craftsmen used to do years ago before mass production became popular.
There is nothing magical or mystical about that.

See above paragraph. And did I mention the words "magical" or "mystical"?
Those are YOUR words which you are attempting to place in my mouth.
I'm resisting because of the part of your anatomy from which you
pull your words!

--
Due to SPAM innundation above address is turned off!