UFO COVER-UP EVIDENCE...
wrote in message ...
In sci.astro Fred Garvin wrote:
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 15:50:09 -0400, Starlord wrote:
Can I use all the BS in this crap in my garden? Should help make the
plants grow!
That stuff isn't even good enough to be used for that.
Interesting. Now doesn't just all of this absolutely MAKE the
point I've been discussing here? Mainstream "science" is
today, religion, NOT science! If it ain't "scripture"
it's "BS". Not worthy of even being looked at, let alone
being discussed! Heads buried deep in the sand! Oh,
and that man who is in that small group of people
who've been to the moon? He's just a Kook and Liar!
Maybe when YOU come back from the moon you might
have a bit more credibility!
The old, tired litany of the frustrated pseudoscientist. "If a scientist
refuses to even consider my patently goofy notions, they must be true."
What in the world makes you think that UFOs have *not* been looked into by
mainstream science? They have, and every single time anything resembling
evidence has been found utterly wanting. It ain't up to the scientists to
prove anything. You think UFOs are spacecraft piloted by aliens? Well, then,
you prove it.
RM
|