"ivk" wrote in message
...
| you are not realistic.
|
| Not realistic about what ? My post was a question rather than a
| statment.

"| One way to directly observe planets of remote stars is to use a space
| telescope with a resolution better than the orbit of the planet, and
| cover the direct light from the star with a screen."


Looks like ****in' stupid statement to me, you lying idiot.

This is a photograph of a star with planet of it, you stupid moron:

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap061114.html

I'm sorry to have to tell you this, but you are not realistic.

Got it now, cretin?