In article ,
Rudolph_X wrote:
Earl Colby Pottinger wrote:
Rudolph_X :
{SNIP usual ZetaDrone garbage]
But Rudolph_X, Planet X was suppose to come months ago and wipe out all us
debunkers. But we are still here, and all our predictions have been corret.
On the otherhand not one of Nancy's predictions for planet x came true and
here you are still trying to push the same old claims that never panned out
in the first place.
Add onto it the fact that you said that you would never post here again, yet
here you are making a liar out of yourself, then why care anything about what
you say when we already know that you and Nancy are both self-admitted liars?
Please get a life.
Earl Colby Pottinger
You should know by now, that I like to drop in from time to time, just
to see what you folks are up to.
True, we know by now that your claims are nothing to trust.....
Hey, I didn't write that article. I just provided a link to it.
You did more than that --- you also claimed it was "interesting"....
Folks can decide for themselves if what was written there is true or false.
The article is obviously false! I mean, it's impossible for a
planet, or ANY celestial body, to move in an Earth-like orbit and
always be hidden from our view by the Sun, and at the same time have
an orbital period of 3600 years as this article claims.... In
addition any "anti-Earth" moving in the Earth's orbit but on the
other side of the Sun such that the Sun always hides it from our
vire, such a planet would soon reveal its presence anyway by its
perturbations on the other planets (in particular Venus and Mars).
No such perturbations have ever been observed.
He also wrote a lot of other nonsense besides his speculations about
PX. Here he was much more vague though, so at least he avoided
outright self-contradictions. Consider this:
# GB: Can you be more specific about the location of this installation?
#
# VU: Look for the site of the Tunguska explosion. To the southeast is
# the very large and famous Lake Baikal. Beyond that, to the
# north, is a huge and barren territory covering 100,000
# kilometres. Hardly anyone lives there. There are no towns or
# cities. Here is where we located the installation ...
He never gets more specific than this. Why didn't he instead just
provide an accurate longitude and latitude of this "installation" he
claims to have found? Today it's easy to do so, with GPS receivers
being so easily available.
(also: he doesn't seem to know the difference between kilometers and
square kilometers.... but perhaps he meant that this barren area was
100,000 kilometers across? Well, if so, it's indeed a huge barren
area, with a diameter some eight times larger than the diameter of
the entire Earth!!! g )
Calling me a liar isn't going to change that.
My detractors always engage in personal attacks... they never discuss
the issues at hand. The link I posted was about what a Russian scientist
had to say about 'Planet_X'... The content of the article has nothing to
do with me. I didn't write it. I just posted a link to it. Personal
attacks against me... have nothing whatsoever to do with what the
Russian scientist said about Planet_X.
But what he has to say about PX, which you find "interesting"
according to your own words, is just as impossible as what N*nc* had
to say about PX..... nothing new here.....
Hey, thanks for your comments anyway. It is always nice to hear from
you, you old rattlesnake.
THINK before you post next time, will you ????
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Schlyter, Grev Turegatan 40, SE-114 38 Stockholm, SWEDEN
e-mail: pausch at stockholm dot bostream dot se
WWW:
http://www.stjarnhimlen.se/
http://home.tiscali.se/pausch/