On Dec 18, 8:56 am, Cyber Trekker wrote:
s.desear wrote:
Greysky All of the universe's mysteries have to have an easy simple
answer.Einstein and Bohr,told us that. Bert+Sandra

I, as others, disagree with Greysky's theory as to the nature of gravity,
with all due respect to him and his effort in putting forward an
alternative theory to the manifold mainstream theories. Rather than
explaining what gravity actually is, as is his claim, it is just another
theory amongst many theories and the 'actually is' part of his claim is
rather presumptive and misleading. His assertion as to humanity's
ignorance, however, is quite true, being right on the mark and epitomising
the sad state of affairs of human learning or the knowledge possessed or
not by humanity in its interpretation of nature and life.

Also, I would like to add for your benefit, irrespective of the
pronouncements of such as Einstein and Bohr, as you made reference to,
simplicity is really a relative term. The beauty of simplicity, then, is in
its statement. For the simplest answer is not always the correct answer.
Nonetheless, when a correct interpretation of nature is arrived at and
presented in simple terms, then the claim of simplicity in the presentation
of the answer is valid. And the reason simplicity is a relative term is
because it is dependent on the knowledge and comprehension (understanding),
which together are intimately tied to perception, of the person considering
it - to one it may appear simple, yet to another it may appear complicated.


Our NASA has a spendy new and greatly improved supercomputer that can
help prove damn near anything, and in relatively short order. (is it
doing anything?)
- Brad Guth -