Venus is simply an Earth like toasty poptart of a newish planet,
that's getting itself geothermally forced from the bottom up, although
having a POOF City as our interplanetary depot/gateway at Venus L2 is
more than a touch on the cool side. However, if we can't even manage
a mostly robotic Clarke Station within our moon's interactive L1, much
less of anything moon tethered, then even the extremely nearby worth
of the halo orbital energy efficient and much lower gamma radiation
location of our utilizing Venus L2 is never going to happen.

From what's officially offered to us as purely in-house or via
minionship endorsed evidence, I still do not believe that we've
returned safely from having walked on that moon, as there's just way
too many easy enough methods of proof-positive that could and should
have been employed, that would have 100+% nailed that question as an
easily replicated matter of fact, as well as easily accommodated via
computer simulated orbital 3D interactive physics, that is if we in
fact had ever down-range soft landed and having walked on that dusty
moon 6 times w/o so much as a DNA scratch.

So, we'll need that new and improved fleet of Barack Obama shuttles,
along with those fully reusable LRBs, that which at most becomes a
50/50 kind of public/private investment, and that's going to happen w/
o our infamous NASA because, like so much of our old guard cold-war
government that's intent upon global energy domination, it seems they
and of their semitic puppeteers simply can not be trusted with our
hard earned loot or our private parts. So, it's past due for a fresh
start, that is if we can somehow manage to avoid WWIII.

Ponder your way through this one:
A few of us outsiders have been and/or become sufficiently correct
about our naked moon that seems somewhat hollow or at least light
headed (as possibly having a mostly sodium core), in that much of our
terrestrial physics and replicated science that relates to those
spendy fly-by-rocket Apollo missions, and about our reactive/
anticathode moon that's so physically dark, that simply doesn't add up
according to that holy grail of our NASA/Apollo Old Testament.

If we'd landed upon and collectively (US+USSR) having left 171 tonnes
of our mostly metallic crap on that moon, much of it physically
sizable or having become unavoidably impact scattered over a km+
radius (unless that surface debris and dust at impact was simply too
damn thick), whereas you'd think most any GB-SAR obtained image is
unavoidably going to look in places as somewhat like a seriously lit
up Christmas tree parked in the center of an open pit coal mine.

I believe that somewhat old radar imaging resolution via Arecibo is
actually worthy of 20 meters/pixel, and having so much as an empty
beer can within any one of those 20 by 20 meter pixels is in fact
going to light up that given GB-SAR pixel by pixel observation quite
nicely, especially when all of that crystal dry cosmic debris as moon
dust that's surrounding that empty beer can is hardly anything but
radar signal reflective.

Sadly, not even God or those of his/her minion wizards can help the
likes of our MI5/NSA/CIA~NASA's Usenet cesspool of infowar/infomercial
spewing spooks and moles, or so many brown-nosed others of their
pretend atheist kind. Of course otherwise those terrestrial smart
brown-nosed folks of the all-knowing mainstream status quo or bust
(aka Skull and Bones semitic Third Reich) could have always used any
one of those true to life virtual simulations via any number of public
owned supercomputers in order to easily prove myself wrong, though
they've all had nearly 8 years and counting with less than zero/zilch
worth of favorable results so far.

I guess it's still going Usenet 0, Guth 1.

BTW, remote PC/mouse tampering is a federal offence (pretty hard to
miss the per cession "Error Console" reporting and such loss of mouse/
cursor control as so often happening), and yet in spite of this
mainstream of damage-control gauntlet, I've just posted another topic
"To Tell the Truth" for all the warm and fuzzy enjoyment of those
diehard naysayers and brown-nosed minions of the mainstream status
quo, not unlike most others within Usenet.
- Brad Guth


On Nov 24, 11:24 am, BradGuth wrote:
Usenet: rec.photo.digital
Thanks again to our once upon a time "tomcat", for having posted
another link to this updated page ofVenusimages.http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/th...humbnails.html

Some of the most interesting of AI information can be found within
image No.17 from the top left, as being the 225 m/pixel composite
frame of such radar obtained pixels that so happens to include the
robust, rather sizable and somewhat complex community of 'GUTHVenus',
of which you folks should apply your own PhotoShop resampling/
enlargement of at least 3X, along with whatever unsharp mask filter
plus other image cleaning or treatment options you'd care to apply.
Remember that a purely negative or naysay mindset of a true rusemaster
simply can not accomplish such enlargements without making whatever
image look worse off than it really is. (go figure)
"Lava channels, Lo Shen Valles,Venusfrom Magellan Cycle 1"http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/html/object_page/mgn_c115s095_1.htmlhttp://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hires/mgn_c115s095_1.gif

If you still can not find this rational community worth of extremely
interesting pixels, then you are not nearly as good at
observationology as you think you are.

Digital photo resampling or enlarging with various pixel interpolation
algorithms are not new nor unused by our NIMA and multiple other spy
and commercial photo agencies. The sorts of freeware or trialware
such as PhotoCleaner, PhotoZoom and CleanerZoomer are just examples
that'll perform as well or better than ADOBE PhotoShop, are each
sufficiently user friendly and as always allows for user options in
order to suit the kinds of results that'll yield the best possible
enlargement without introducing weird distortions or artifacts out of
thin air(sort of speak).

http://www.photocleaner.com
PhotoCleaner w/multiple resize algorithms and automatic unsharp

http://www.benvista.com/main/content...page=downloads
PhotoZoom Pro w/S-Spline XL interpolation algorithm enlarging

CleanerZoomerhttp://www.stratopoint.com/czoomer.htm
Of course the digital radar image of 36 looks per pixel is somewhat
better to begin with, as nearly 3D worthy and each raw pixel being
about as real or as truth worthy of pixel as we're going to get, which
sort of makes up for the 225 meter per pixel resolution that's being
enlarged for a better look-see at whatever's most likely associated
with those raw pixels.

http://www.clarkvision.com/imagedeta...-restoration1/
"Red Fox, image from Figure 3 after photoshop unsharp mask, radius =
4.0, 75%, threshold = 3, then another unsharp mask with radius = 2.0,
66%, threshold = 3. This is a about the best I can do with the unsharp
mask tool"

As you can see for yourself, between ADOBE PhotoShop and Adaptive
Richardson-Lucy Iteration there's nothing getting artificially
generated via enlarge/resampling and unsharp applications that created
weird pixels out of nowhere. As long as the raw pixel patterns were
there to behold in the first place, there's nothing that gets software
AI or otherwise created weird in the enlarged images that's
indifferent to whatever those original pixels represent. Of course
with the likes of PhotoShop is where any damn village idiot fool can
just as easily force the original image into distorting everything in
sight, which only proves that such a result can be accomplished if
that's the intended objective.

However, most folks within Usenet's anti-think-tank of naysayland
should as IggyZiggy says, have that word "obfuscate" tattooed to their
forehead, as they quite often intend to live, breathe, eat, and
worship that mostly semitic God of obfuscation by using word games,
something their Third Reich and the likes of our very own resident
LLPOF warlord(GW Bush) and of his puppeteer Dick Cheney are really
good at obfuscating the hell out of most everything.

So, when I've asked of others to share and share alike, as to
providing their own best effort examples of the image pertaining toVenusthat I'd pointed out as of nearly 8 years ago, lo and behold the
brown-nosed obfuscation clowns of Usenet's naysayland kicked into full
topic/author stalking, bashing and banishment action, whit all of
their usual gauntlet of evidence exclusion so as to not rock their
mainstream good ship LOLLIPOP status quo that's clearly more semitic
faith based than not.

We need to take a very close look atVenus, as for giving this
extremely nearby planet proper consideration on behalf of other
intelligent life that once upon a time having been and by rights may
even still be existing/coexisting within that geothermally forced
environment, of their having survived within such a newish worth of
active planetology that not exactly user friendly to the likes of us
naked humans. I'm certainly not speaking of the dumbfounded sorts of
naked humans without a clue other than their terrestrial limited faith-
based analogy towards everything, but rather of either locally evolved
and/or new and improved species as having been imported intelligent
life, that's simply utilizing applied physics and obviously good
technology that's taking the fullest advantage of their applied
physics and local cache of such vast amounts of renewable energy.

There's no argument thatVenusin most surface locations is nearly hot
as hell, however, if you can constructively contribute a little
something of image processing, or otherwise on behalf of explaining
the sorts of physics and applied technology that'll function within
such a thermal dynamic worth of planetology, that'll actually survive
within the regular laws of physics (such as the process of the local
makings and sustaining ice), is exactly what I'd appreciate and give
the fullest of credit for whatever talent or expertise you'd care to
share.
--
Brad Guth