Just because the frail DNA of mere humans haven't walked on the moon
is no good reason as to why those future rad-hard and physically
robust robotics of Japan and China can't manage.
Perhaps this is best being shared with other Usenet groups:
rec.photo.digital, uk.rec.photo.misc, alt.journalism.newspapers,
alt.revisionism, sci.geo.satellite-nav, sci.geo.geology, talk.atheism
In addition of our getting access to those new and greatly improved
images of our moon that's will worth further enlarging, plus future
loads of other new and improved science that'll begin telling us what
that naked and somewhat salty moon surface has to offer, there's still
good old and at times extremely nearby Venus that's looking as though
having been lived upon.
Thanks again to our once upon a time "tomcat", for having posted
another public link to this somewhat updated page of Venus images.
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/th...humbnails.html
Some of the most interesting of AI pixel worthy information can be
found within image No.17 from the top left, as being the 225 m/pixel
composite frame of such radar obtained pixels that so happens to
include the robust, rather sizable and somewhat complex community of
'GUTH Venus', of which you folks should apply your own PhotoShop
resampling/enlargement of at least 3X, along with whatever unsharp
mask filter plus other image cleaning or treatment options you'd care
to apply. Remember that a purely negative or naysay mindset of a true
rusemaster simply can not accomplish such enlargements without making
whatever image look worse off than it really is. (go figure)
"Lava channels, Lo Shen Valles, Venus from Magellan Cycle 1"
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/ht...115s095_1.html
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hi...c115s095_1.gif
If you still can not find this rational community worth of extremely
interesting pixels, then you are not nearly as good at
observationology as you think you are. Usually this only happens with
the sorts of pretend atheists that are forever stuck or sequestered
within their own faith-based naysay mode, regardless of whatever
physics or the best available science has to offer.
Digital photo resampling or enlarging with various pixel interpolation
algorithms are not new nor unused by our NIMA and multiple other spy
and commercial photo agencies. The sorts of freeware or trialware
such as PhotoCleaner, PhotoZoom and CleanerZoomer are just examples
that'll perform as well or better than ADOBE PhotoShop, are each
sufficiently user friendly and as always allows for user options in
order to suit the kinds of results that'll yield the best possible
enlargement without introducing weird distortions or artifacts out of
thin air(sort of speak).
http://www.photocleaner.com
PhotoCleaner w/multiple resize algorithms and automatic unsharp
http://www.benvista.com/main/content...otozoompro_ 1
http://www.benvista.com/main/content...page=downloads
PhotoZoom Pro w/S-Spline XL interpolation algorithm enlarging
CleanerZoomer
http://www.stratopoint.com/czoomer.htm
Of course the digital radar image of 36 looks per pixel is somewhat
better to begin with, as nearly 3D worthy and each raw pixel being
about as real or as truth worthy of pixel as we're going to get, which
sort of makes up for the 225 meter per pixel resolution that's being
enlarged for a better look-see at whatever's most likely associated
with those raw pixels.
http://www.clarkvision.com/imagedeta...-restoration1/
"Red Fox, image from Figure 3 after photoshop unsharp mask, radius =
4.0, 75%, threshold = 3, then another unsharp mask with radius = 2.0,
66%, threshold = 3. This is a about the best I can do with the unsharp
mask tool"
As you can see for yourself, between ADOBE PhotoShop and Adaptive
Richardson-Lucy Iteration there's nothing getting artificially
generated via enlarge/resampling and unsharp applications that created
weird pixels out of nowhere. As long as the raw pixel patterns were
there to behold in the first place, there's nothing that gets software
AI or otherwise created weird in the enlarged images that's
indifferent to whatever those original pixels represent. Of course
with the likes of PhotoShop is where any damn village idiot fool can
just as easily force the original image into distorting everything in
sight, which only proves that such a result can be accomplished if
that's the intended objective.
However, most folks within Usenet's anti-think-tank of naysayland
should as IggyZiggy says, have that word "obfuscate" tattooed to their
forehead, as they quite often intend to live, breathe, eat, and
worship that mostly semitic God of obfuscation by using word games,
something their Third Reich and the likes of our very own resident
LLPOF warlord(GW Bush) and of his puppeteer Dick Cheney are really
good at obfuscating the hell out of most everything.
So, when I've asked of others to share and share alike, as to
providing their own best effort examples of the image pertaining to
Venus that I'd pointed out as of nearly 8 years ago, lo and behold the
brown-nosed obfuscation clowns of Usenet's naysayland kicked into full
topic/author stalking, bashing and banishment action, whit all of
their usual gauntlet of evidence exclusion so as to not rock their
mainstream good ship LOLLIPOP status quo that's clearly more semitic
faith based than not.
We need to take a very close look at Venus, as for giving this
extremely nearby planet proper consideration on behalf of other
intelligent life that once upon a time having been and by rights may
even still be existing/coexisting within that geothermally forced
environment, of their having survived within such a newish worth of
active planetology that not exactly user friendly to the likes of us
naked humans. I'm certainly not speaking of the dumbfounded sorts of
naked humans without a clue other than their terrestrial limited faith-
based analogy towards everything, but rather of either locally evolved
and/or new and improved species as having been imported intelligent
life, that's simply utilizing applied physics and obviously good
technology that's taking the fullest advantage of their applied
physics and local cache of such vast amounts of renewable energy.
There's no argument that Venus in most surface locations is nearly hot
as hell, however, if you can constructively contribute a little
something of image processing, or otherwise on behalf of explaining
the sorts of physics and applied technology that'll function within
such a thermal dynamic worth of planetology, that'll actually survive
within the regular laws of physics (such as the process of the local
makings and sustaining ice), is exactly what I'd appreciate and give
the fullest of credit for whatever talent or expertise you'd care to
share.
--
Brad Guth