On Nov 18, 10:30 am, Michael Gallagher wrote:
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 11:13:47 -0800 (PST), BradGuth

wrote:
.... do we see anything of that naked lunar terrain that's looking as
though being the least bit NASA/Apollo (65%~75% reflective) 0.65~0.075
albedo worthy ....

Yes. Apart from the color -- which could be an artifiact of the
camera --- it doesn't look too different from the images returned from
the Moon by Apollo. I just looked in one of the books I have.

As to how bright the Moon is or isnt, go outside on a full Moon. It
looks pretty bright to me.

Now please go and take your meds.

Coal offers an albedo of 0.1, as 10% reflective of the visual
spectrum. and that's pretty darn close to what the average reflective
surface of our moon really is, although actually having a somewhat
deep golden brownish hue or tint that only gets terribly color skewed
to the unfiltered Kodak eye, or especially to the wider spectrum
sensitive CCD eye by all of that raw photon saturation and secondary/
recoil worth of UV, near UV plus those of a violet worth of solar
photons.

BTW, there's actual NASA obtained images of our moon and Earth within
the exact same frame that proves I'm 100% correct. Those images have
been posted for more than a decade.

Sorry to hear that you're such an obvious bigot, and a liar to boot.
--
Brad Guth