Less Apollo 11, more Thunderbird 11. Wires prove the Apollo moonlandings were filmed on a set.
BradGuth wrote:
On Nov 12, 6:45 am, "Dean A. Markley" wrote:
BradGuth wrote:
On Nov 10, 11:14 pm, Hobo wrote:
Isolation, divorce, depression - the cost of Nasa's mission to reach
the Moon was borne heaviest by the wives of the astronauts. In their
struggle to cope they formed their own support network.
"Nasa wanted perfect wives, perfect children, perfect homes. There was
certainly some pressure there." Susan Borman, Apollo 8 wife.
So did Hitler and of those Zion puppeteers in charge of his private
parts.
It seems NASA got hold of some of the very best of Hitler's brains, in
the form of those semitic rocket and chemical/biological wizards that
made their previous boss so much better off. It seems that Zion Jews
also believe firmly in global domination, as well as in the continued
perfection of their genetic DNA code.
There is a strong basis of real physics and of replicated scientific
facts that questions our NASA/Apollo wizards, as supposedly having all
"the right stuff", as for their simply having NOT walked upon our
physically dark moon.
--
Brad Guth
Give it a rest already! Do you enjoy being proven wrong, repeatedly?
Speaking for yourself and fellow brown-nosed minions of your semitic
Third Reich?
What is it about the regular laws of physics and the best available
science that's independently replicated, that's "proven wrong"?
How the heck did you spooks/moles and borg like cult of Hitler's all-
knowing rusemasters of such hocus-pocus puppeteering manage to hide
Venus?
Are you saying that our moon isn't physically dark, isn't the least
bit salty, isn't anticathode reactive and thus isn't the least bit
unfriendly to our frail DNA or unfiltered Kodak film?
Are you saying we have enough rocket for getting nearly 50 tonnes so
quickly into that 100 km circular orbit, even though being of nearly
30% inert GLOW to start off with?
Are you saying that we actually have a fully R&D prototype of proven
fly-by-rocket landers that can be demonstrated?
--
Brad Guth
Yes. The prosecution rests.
|