(Greg Hennessy) wrote in message ...
In article ,
Aladar wrote:
BS. They assume that a stupid solution of field equations, based on
point mass and empty space is correct! I have shown - and the
observations prove it - that it is incorrect! [t'=t/(1-fi)^1/3 and not
the following from the ASSUMPTIONS(!) t'=t/(1-2fi)^1/2 erratic old
time dilation in GR]

Where have you shown it? You were asked for a reference to this, and
you provided a cite to a paper that you admitted didn't consider the
(1-fi)^-1/3 case.

However, it provided a report of a systematic error in the right
direction and of the right magnitude, corresponding to the
differences of my representation from the old erratic so called GR and
the really observed in 77 in the GPS proved mine is correct.


Where is the calculations showing (1-fi)^-1/3 is better than
(1-2fi)^-1/2? What is the chi squared fit of both functions?

Try http://stolmarphysics.com

Cheers!
Aladar