On Oct 21, 12:17 pm, oldcoot wrote:
On Oct 21, 12:03 pm, Double-A wrote:





"The situation improves if we endow the rotating mass with a strong
magnetic field. The equation would look now as follows:

mf2 = mr2 - mr2 Bk u2 / c2

Where Bk would be a dimensionless term related to the magnetic field
strength of the rotating mass. In this case there is no need to rotate
the disk at prohibitively high speed, the weight reduction should be
now within reach of our instruments. The reduction could be so strong
to render mass mr weightless, not only, but we could reach a point
where, at a certain rotational speed, the right term of the above
equation would become negative hinting at the possibility of a real
antigravitational force."

http://www.journaloftheoretics.com/A...io/DiMario.htm

What they're still not 'getting' is that unless there is an
acceleration(or deceleration) component to the apparatus' spin, there
can be no gravitic(or antigravitic) effect. Those experiments with
spinning superconductors by the European Space Agency (posted earlier
in another thread) bear this out. The ESA is just beginning to 'get'
the fact that without acceleration there is no gravity, which puts
them at just about the 'Franklin's Kite' stage. oc


Well, a black hole is accelerating its spin because it is in a state
of collapsing. While the rate of it's spin and it's acceleration
become imperceptibly slow from our frame of reference because of the
time difference, could it be that the antigravitational force from its
accelerating spin creates becomes frozen in place?

Double-A