On Oct 10, 11:43 pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Oct 9, 11:58 am, "jb" wrote:

"Rand Simberg" wrote in message In spades.

Killfile him, as most sane people have.

How would YOU know what sane people do? :-))

Interesting how terribly upset the mainstream status quo tends to get,
especially whenever we're asking about any of those unfiltered Kodak
FOVs as easily having included Venus, or much less of anything
pertaining to this JAXA Selene mission that even though less than half
the inert mass still took so much extra applied physics of rocket
energy, and for such taking better than 11 fold the amount of travel
time for getting their equipment into final orbit.

Is JAXA's rocket physics actually that primitive and/or outdated, in
that they simply couldn't have matched or much less improved upon
those methods utilized by our Third Reich Yids responsible for
accomplishing most of our NASA/Apollo missions?
- Brad Guth -

It would help if you spook/wrote in English all most as much as it
would help if Google Groups had filters.