October 10th 07, 03:10 AM
posted to rec.aviation.military,aus.politics,uk.politics.misc,sci.space.history,rec.models.rockets
|
|
|
Less Apollo 11, more Thunderbird 11. Wires prove the Apollo moonlandings were filmed on a set.
Doc Smartass wrote:
stealthboogie wrote in
ups.com:
On Oct 9, 9:22?am, bob352 wrote:
OK, Let's see.....I'm from the Government....I want to perpetraie a
hoax on the American people...aw, what the hell, let's b.s. the
WORLD....sooooo....I'm gonna spend millions on a set, bribing people
to keep silent....gee, guess I'm gonna hafta develop a giant rocket to
launch, just to pad the bill a little,......but you know what? I'm not
even gonna worry about editing our film, just a waste of time....
PULL yer HEAD OUTTA yer A$$ !!!!!!!!
Millions? More like 100's of millions. Do you know what it costs for
union grips, gaffers, camera men, lighting, scene & costume desginers,
not to mention the Equity actors? It's obvious it was cheaper to go TO
the moon, than make a movie about it. Heck Apollo 13 cost $52mil, and
they didn't have to shoot scenes landing on the moon. 
Teamsters, man. Can't forget the Teamsters--gotta move a truck, gotta get
with them, or the truck doesn't move. Union rules!
How many Teamsters does it take to change a light bulb? 12, got a
problem with that?
Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
|