On Sep 23, 9:59 pm, (John Savard)
wrote:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 13:53:21 -0700, oriel36
wrote, in part:

rather than
pretension based on transitory guesswork using a non geometric
language.

The analytic geometry of Descartes allows one to use the language of
analysis to solve problems with greater facility; this method is
well-proven by experience, and is not guesswork.

John Savardhttp://www.quadibloc.com/index.html

You have the attention span of a gnat,you are full of opinions you
hardly understand but you are most certainly a modern type.There were
once genuine investigators who found themselves in a dilemma created
by Newton and they really tried to find their way out or back to a
position where to could move ahead productively.All that exists now
are the living dead,people who create whatever story they need to
reach whatever conclusion they want,scientific,historical and bottom
line.

http://www.bodley.ox.ac.uk/cgi-bin/i...5 4.336.x.425

I offer astronomers a way back to the stable era of Copernican
heliocentricity and to pick it up again as a productive and noble
discipline it once was as a point of departure for new astronomical
endeavors.You can wander from forum to forum like a lost
creature,chanting Newtonian or Carteian philosophy without having any
idea what is behind it,men,good and genuine dynamicists, once could
discern the difference but not any longer.