I am doing a poor job of following the purported chapters of this book
as I seem to be
jumping to whatever topic followed the last. Perhaps when I write the
2nd edition of this
book I will put it into chapter order. So much of this book is new and
thus cutting edge
theory. When I wrote the guideline to the chapter titles I did not
know the Magnetosphere
would play such a key role in this theory of Growing Solar System. And
there is very
much we do not know about the Magnetosphere. But now I am going to
write about
something which is very extremely unknown-- the center of a star or
planet.

In this theory of Growing Solar System, apparently the bulk of the
mass of a star
or planet is accreted from Cosmic Rays and Cosmic Gamma Rays. But the
star
and planet originally was borne as a QM-seed-dot. Which is a few atoms
that
continues to grow. Obviously a planet or star when borne from a few
atoms is not
going to have a magnetosphere, and so how does it grow into a star or
planet
before it does possess a magnetosphere?

So what this theory of Growing Solar System via Dirac new
radioactivities suggests
is that a QM-seed-dot is a special conglomeration of atoms which is
linked to the
Nucleus of the Atom Totality and which has particles materialize in
the center of that
QM-seed-dot. My impression is that a energetic Gamma Ray burst can
occur at the
center of a QM-seed-dot which makes it grow faster than any
surrounding particles
or collections of atoms in the surrounding space.

I am speaking of Earth when it was borne as a few atoms and grew into
a large
enough planet to have a magnetosphere. So the sources of mass to make
Earth
grow were (1) materialization of mass from the Atom Totality Nucleus
directly to the
center of the seed-dot (2) acquired mass from the impact of the seed
dot as it
travels through space (3) mass acquired when the magnetosphere is
formed.

Two of those sources are easy to check upon and observe and confirm
but the
materialization at the center of the seed-dot is very much more
difficult to confirm
provided it is true. What I suspect is going on at the center of a QM-
seed-dot are
the materialization of large amounts of energy/mass such as a
energetic Cosmic
Ray or Gamma Ray of the order of 10^20 eV. So the infant Earth of a
small ball
say the size of a orange or apple would not have a magnetosphere to
grow
rapidly nor grow rapidly from the impact of particles to the surface
of this infant-Earth.
So the center of this infant-Earth would receive a energetic Cosmic
Ray of the
amount of 10^20 eV or perhaps 10^25 eV which would be a mass addition
to the
orange or apple sized Earth and thus become pumpkin sized or
watermelon
sized Earth. And then another Cosmic Ray of 10^25 eV materializes in
the center of
this infant Earth and growing larger.

Do we know if ever there was something big going on at the center of
the Sun or
Jupiter or Earth? Do we know whether a Cosmic Ray of 10^25 eV
materialized in
the center of Earth today would leave some sort of evidence?

So what I am saying is that we have three ways of growing a star or
planet when it
starts out as a QM-seed-dot of a few atoms. We have the collisions of
this seed-dot
with mass in its path which then becomes a larger seed-dot. And we
have magnetosphere
accretion of Cosmic Rays and Cosmic Gamma Rays once the planet or star
is big enough to form a magnetosphere. And it is the third means of
growing that
this post is addressing. The idea that the center of this QM-seed-dot
is linked directly
to the Nucleus of the Atom Totality which then so-to-speak, directly
pipelines massive
particles to the center-of- QM-seed-dot.

Now perhaps some pulsars or quasars maybe evidence of this center
contribution.
That a pulsar or quasar maybe where a star center receives periodic
Gamma Rays
directly into the center of the star which then emits uniform pulses.

So I have a lot of work to be done on how a QM-seed-dot grows to
becoming a
planet or star, before it gains a magnetosphere. More knowledge of the
cores
of young planets like Jupiter compared to old planets like Earth or
Mercury
my help in answering this growth of young planets or young stars.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies