View Single Post
  #9  
Old September 5th 07, 06:04 PM posted to sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.geo.geology
a_plutonium[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 194
Default #7 can explain the heavy water on Comets and lighter water on planets; new book: Growing-Solar-System theory via Dirac New-Radioactivity replaces Nebular-Dust-Cloud theory

I should summarize at this moment before I go further. For the Growing
Solar System theory to
work and replace the Nebular Dust Cloud theory, there must be a
mechanism of a flow or flux
of particles which makes bodies grow over a 5 to 10 billion years.
That mechanism is Dirac's
new radioactivity and it takes the form of Cosmic Rays and Gamma Rays
which originate
from the Nucleus of the Atom Totality. So I need a flow rate of approx
2 x 10^9 kilograms
per minute over 5 billion years to model the growing of Earth. That
rate of flow resembles the
rate of liters per minute by the Amazon River. So where on Earth is
there such a flow rate of
new mass coming and impacting and bombarding Earth? The answer is the
Magnetosphere.

So Earth begins where the Magnetosphere begins. The volume of Earth's
Magnetosphere
is in dispute, but I peg it around that of 10^31 cm^3 volume. It could
be 10^30 or 10^32.

So I need a number data of how many Cosmic Rays exist in the
Magnetosphere and that
figure is not well established because it is difficult to place
instruments into the Magnetosphere.
I peg the density of Cosmic Rays within the Earth Magnetosphere on
average as about
1.3 x 10^5 Cosmic Rays per cm^3 per minute. That is a reasonable
estimate because the
Fly's Eye Instrument in the Utah desert measures the density about
10^3 cm^2 per second.

What is not in dispute is the fact that the proton mass is 1.6 x
10^-27 kg. So when I multiply
these three parameters together I get a rate of flow of 2 x 10^9
kilograms per minute where
the particles drift to the Surface of Earth in the form of mostly
neutral atoms and molecules such
as hydrogen or water or nitrogen etc.

Both the Nebular Dust Cloud theory and the Growing Solar System theory
must explain how
Earth got all of its water and why the water on Earth is lighter than
the heavy water of Comets.
And both theories have to explain how comets get their water if they
want to be serious theories.
So how does the Nebular Dust Cloud theory answer the question as to
why comets have so
much water and why is it so heavy of a water? The answer that the
Growing Solar System
provides is that water is formed on those planets and satellites that
have a form of a Magnetosphere
which turns Cosmic Rays into mostly "light water" and plenty of light
water the more powerful
the planet Magnetosphere is. So Earth has a strong magnetosphere and
thus oceans of water.


Now I looked to see if the polar regions get alot of "new water" from
outer space due to the Magnetosphere
and what I found were terms such as "aurorae", "polar wind" and "polar
rain". What we need to
find out now is whether the polar regions seem to be outlets of "new
water" that was created
by the Magnetosphere turning Cosmic Rays into mostly "light water".

The Growing Solar System theory has to explain how Comets have so much
water in the first
place? Comets do not have a magnetosphere as far as I know. So how do
Comets grow water
in the Growing Solar System theory? The answer I can provide is the
path or orbit of Comets
in that they traverse through the Solar Winds and the Interplanetary-
Space that has alot of
Cosmic Rays. So as the Comet traverses the Interplanetary-Space it
loses some of its ice
in the form of the Comet-tail that we see, but it also gains new water
as it moves through
the path. Water formed in Inteplanetary-Space without the help of a
magnetosphere is heavier
water than that formed in magnetospheric space. So that is an attempt
to answer the difference
between Comet water and Earth water and why Earth and other planets
have so much.

Most people think that the start of Earth proper is the surface crust
of Earth as a planet. But
the proper astronomical start of Earth is really Earth's
Magnetosphere. It would be interesting
to redo the images and pictures and calculations of planetary science
from the viewpoint of
magnetospheres as the start of a planet and not as some exotic or
esoteric appendage of a
planet.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies