September 4th 07, 10:25 AM
posted to sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.geo.geology
|
|
|
#1b: preface to new book: Growing-Solar-System theory via DiracNew-Radioactivity replaces Nebular-Dust-Cloud theory
a_plutonium wrote:
Let me try to straighten out the chapters a bit more before I go to
the introduction. There are
two concepts brand new to science that need to be clarified and by
giving them a proper
scientific name is helpful. The two new concepts are "seed-dot" and
"cellwell".
"Seed-dot" is the idea that in the Atom Totality, the point in space
where planet Earth
is to be borne and grow into a planet via cosmic rays accumulating at
that point. So
let me call this new concept that of QM-seed-dot. The "QM" standing
for Quantum
Mechanics and the "seed" for the idea that the astro body will be
borne from that
point in space and the "dot" for the electron-dot-cloud representation
of an electron.
And for the new concept of "CellWell" let me call that QM CellWell.
This concept is
the idea of an Atom Totality that regions of space are marked out as
to where
a solar system will grow henceforth or where a solitary star solar
system will
have a twin star growing with its own solar system. An example will be
easier
to explain this concept. The Sun and the Inner Planets was really the
only
Solar System for the Sun some 10 to 5 billion years ago, and I call
this system
of the Sun and Inner Planets as QM CellWell1. Some 5 billion years ago
was
borne from QM-seed-dots the planets of Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and
Neptune.
And these Outer Planets started growing and growing much faster than
the Sun
and Inner Planets. So the Outer Planets I call QM CellWell2.
Now there is alot about both these concepts that I do not know and
hopefully
each time I write and revise this book, I may find some new
information and
and new knowledge.
New Book: "Growing Solar-System theory via Dirac New-Radioactivity
replaces Nebular-Dust-Cloud theory",
author--Archimedes Plutonium,
Internet book copyrighted and published 1993-2007 (amassed in
Sept 2007 in sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.geo.geology).
Chapters of this book:
(1) preface
(2) introduction
(3) Dirac Radioactivity as explained in his book "Directions in
Physics" and how Cosmic Rays Flux alone can build the Sun and planets
(4) Titius-Bode Solar System spacing
(5) QM-seed-dots of electron-dot-cloud in Mini-Bangs
from Uranium Atom Totality to our present day Plutonium Atom Totality
(6) QM-CellWell1 and QM-CellWell2
(7) zircon crystal dating of Earth age
(8) cores of Sun, planets and satellites as age-dating
(9) abundance of radioactive elements in parts per billion for age-
dating
(10) Cosmic Rays and Cosmic Gamma Ray Bursts for age-dating
(11) exoplanets and binary stars evince a pattern of Growing Solar
Systems not a Nebular Dust Cloud
(12) the universe at large is too impoverished to have supernova
spew dust clouds all about which then forms a solar-system
(13) future news and research reports commentary
I am still trying to locate the very best data on the Cosmic Ray Flux.
As I spoke
of in a recent post that 1/6 the flow of the Amazon River is about 2
billion liters
of water per minute. So if I can verify the data, that Cosmic Ray Flux
to Earth is
of the amount of 2 billion kilograms per minute, then there is no need
for a
Nebular Dust Cloud theory. And in fact, if I can verify that Cosmic
Ray Flux would
trashcan or terminate the Nebular Dust Cloud theory automatically.
Because
it stands to reason that if both were true that Earth would now
possess twice
the mass it presently possesses. Which is an obvious contradiction and
hence
the Nebular Dust Cloud theory was a fake theory all along.
I also found some interesting Gamma Ray Burst Flux information, of an
equation
for Gamma Ray bursts and a speculation that when 1 Gamma Ray Burst is
sighted
that there were 450 to 500 other Gamma Ray Bursts that had occurred.
The equation
from the Harvard or University of Chicago website (can't remember
which) looks
awfully much like an radioactive decay equation. As to the
significance of 450 to
500 bursts joined in some form of Cosmic linking, would make sense in
an
Atom Totality theory in that Cosmic Gamma Ray Bursts is the display of
radioactivity
of the Atom Totality. High energy Cosmic Rays and Gamma Rays are not
phenomenon of the Observable Universe but are events of the Nucleus of
the Atom
Totality. Not events of Supernova or what some are calling HyperNovas.
These
energetic Gamma Rays are created by the Nucleus of the Atom Totality,
keep in
mind that our Observable Universe is a mere electron and so it is
possible that
a Gamma Ray Burst could occur which has the total amount of energy of
our entire
Observable Universe. So that one of these big Gamma Rays if bursted
near
the Solar System would incinerate Earth.
I am rather surprized at how primitive is our data on Cosmic Ray Flux.
Where
some websites are saying that the flux is about "thousands of protons
traversing
a human body per minute". It would be nice to have a very accurate
measure of
Cosmic Ray Flux.
Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
|