On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 18:50:11 +0100, "George Dishman"
wrote:


"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 19:19:48 +0100, "George Dishman"
wrote:
"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
...

The phase reference is only determined by your previous
claims that the luminosity is usually in phase with the
velocity, hence you are claiming the radial velocity
peaks at the same time as the eclipse - I don't think so.

Sorry George, you are wrong again.

I am repeating what you told me and pointing out a
consequence that seems to have conveniently escaped
your notice.

That is not what I told you George.

You told me on several ocassions that the luminosity
is typically in phase with the velocity, ceck your
posts.

The implication of that claim is that th radial ACCELERATION should peak at
roughly the same time as the eclipse.
You still havent gotten used to ADoppler yet George.


http://www.georgedishman.f2s.com/Henri/sine_wrong.png

Check the bottom two plots, those are the true motion
curves so as you can see I did use the equivalent of a
circular orbit. Try putting it into your program. If
you don't get the same as mine, check your coding.

That distance change is negligible.

It is the radius curve and is directly
measurable for L Car.


So who is going to prove the results wrong, eh?..even if they are way out.

George




www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

The difference between a preacher and a used car salesman is that the latter at least has a product to sell.