Henri Wilson a écrit :
On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 14:25:52 +0200, YBM wrote:

Henri Wilson a écrit :
The geometry requires that light move at c in _all_
inertial frames.
Which of course is plainly impossible.
Do you mean that SR geometry is contradictory ?

It's worse than that.

Is worse than contradictory, contradictory or not ?

Why should little planet Earth be
special, the only object in the entire universe
relative to which light _doesn't_ move at c and for
which the rule that governs the rest of the universe
doesn't apply?
Come on George, even Einstein admitted that light will be seen to approach
moving objects at c+v.
Are you, like Andro****, confusing closing velocity with relative velocity,
or are you just lying as usual ?

MY BaTh theory relies solely on 'closing velocity'.

I don't give a sh*t about your "BaTh (non)theory", note that your sentence
is about what Einstein said, hence is related to SR not to your piece of
crap.

Maybe you will now realise how pathetically stupid you are.

I wonder if you'll realize how many stupidities you've written here before
you die, Ralph Rabbidge.