On Jul 5, 5:30 pm, HW@....(Henri Wilson) wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 02:28:57 -0700, Jerry
wrote:

On Jul 4, 6:25 pm, HW@....(Henri Wilson) wrote:

Oh?
Are you suggesting taht light does NOT travel at
c wrt the laser?

No, I am suggesting that incompressible sawblade
photons are incompatible with the existence of
femtosecond laser pulses. There is no way to shape
them to fit within the pulse envelope. Your photon
model is nonsense.

So what is YOUR model of a femtosecond photon?

Understanding femtosecond pulses (or for that matter,
any pulses at all) requires knowledge of a branch of
mathematics of which you are not merely ignorant...
it is a branch of mathematics for which you have
expressed open contempt.

George, bz, Jeff etc. etc. all understand this branch
of mathematics. You do not.

That's all the hint that I will give you.

My computer does the maths....and generates more
curves in a minute than DeSitter and Einstein could
produce in a million years..

GIGO

I know you don't like it.

Yoiu must be good at making up hospital beds by
now. Why don't you stick to the things you know
something about and leave the brainwork to us experts?

I recognize many forms of mental illness by now.
Remember, I did a rotation in a psychiatric ward.

Remeber I have a psychology degree...so I can easily
recognize your delusion of being a great physicist.

Who has delusions? I know perfectly well that I am
merely an advanced amateur astronomer.

You, on the other hand, rank yourself as undoubtedly
the foremost physicist in the entire world, whose
theories about light will overturn and revolutionize
the last three centuries of physics.

This despite the fact that you barely have any grasp
of mathematics beyond basic algebra.

http://www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/group1.jpg
The latest one is interesting. It models an tidally
distored, egg shaped star to produce the presumed
cepheid 'overtone' effect. Makes one rethink whether or
not cepheids really DO go huff puff, eh?

You STILL haven't provided evidence that you can
simultaneously fit luminosity and radial velocity
curves.

I have. You didn't join my conversations with George.

***** SHOW YOUR RADIAL VELOCITY FITS *****

You have not presented any satisfactory SIMULTANEOUS
fits of luminosity and radial velocity for any star.

BaTh has failed, failed, and failed again.

From what I can see, your BaTh program STILL fails
even the simplest fits, despite your addition of
kludge after kludge.

http://www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/group1.jpg

I might add that some of these take about two hours
to match because I have to juggle about six parameter
values in the process. The end result usually
produces values accurate to within about 1%.

***** WHERE ARE YOUR RADIAL VELOCITY CURVES? *****

I now think they just orbit some dark matter,
probably in tidal lock.

So now you suggest that your dark companions are
totally invisible except for gravitational effects?

Relativists claim there is about four times as much
dark matter as visible.
I agree. ...and I have found what it is.
Most variable stars are orbiting some kind of dark object.

The plain fact is, there are far more cold objects
throughout the universe than hot ones.
Why shouldn't there be?

My theory is now almost complete ...and is quite
consistent.

In your dreams...

It will be published soon.

In the Journal of Irreproducible Results, perhaps?

Naw, your theory doesn't even have the merit of
being humorous...

Jerry