"Hallerb" wrote in message
...
or you know that you didn't have dick when you
started flaming NASA management.
read the report it put the blame on the management system

What part of the report? The cover? You'll have to narrow it down to chapter
and page if you're trying to cite it. Otherwise, you continue to sound like
someone who drops names because doing so makes him sound more important (to
himself) than he really is because he hasn't got the brains to actually read
it.

I'd rather read the verifiable references to the evidence you had on hand at
the time you started flaming. You didn't have the CAIB report at the time.

Even better, I'd like to read the answer to my question, which the CAIB
report doesn't answer. What verifiable evidence do you have that, had NASA
management had the meetings you think they should have had, even though the
folks involved say it wouldn't have made any difference, *would have*
resulted in a different outcome, as opposed to *might have*?

Your failure to address the question asked indicates that you are either
unable to understand it, or that once again you're trying to get someone
else to do your homework for you. You should easily be able to answer the
question if you had done your homework before posting. Once again, your
failure to answer the question shows that you were talking out of your ass
when you posted. You name the CAIB report as if it would help you- but you
show that you haven't even read it, because if you had, you'd be able to
point to the specific page and paragraph that supports you.
--
If you have had problems with Illinois Student Assistance Commission (ISAC),
please contact shredder at bellsouth dot net. There may be a class-action
lawsuit
in the works.
/