In article . com,
George Dishman wrote:
On 3 Jul, 03:28, HW@....(Henri Wilson) wrote:
On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 00:22:11 -0700, George Dishman wrote:
On 2 Jul, 01:27, HW@....(Henri Wilson) wrote:
..............................
Get it now, George?

Nothing you have said is at odds with my point, but
you seem to be grasping it a bit better now. You
still have some way to go though.

You might understand now.

The only thing I don't understand is why you are having so much
difficulty following what is essentially a very simple argument.

George

It's probably more of a difficulty for him to admit that he's wrong....

A lot of crackpots react in a similar way: they follow, and agree
with, your logical arguments as long as they don't threaten their pet
ideas. But as soon as your valid logical arguments start to threaten
their ideas, the crackpot ceases to argue logically - he denies your
arguments with vigour, he acts illogicaly, if needed, to stubbornly
defends his ideas. For emotional reasons, of course.

--
----------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Schlyter, Grev Turegatan 40, SE-114 38 Stockholm, SWEDEN
e-mail: pausch at stockholm dot bostream dot se
WWW: http://stjarnhimlen.se/