On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:21:00 +0100, "George Dishman"
wrote:


"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 00:18:44 -0700, George Dishman
wrote:

I started writing a reply to this post but had network
problems so it's stuck elsewhere. I'll post that tomorrow.

Predictions are indeed important. My program correctly predicts variable
star
curves, using BaTh.

You keep telling me that the luminosity of Cepheids is due
to ADoppler while the velocity curve is VDoppler so have a
look at this page.

I tell you nothing of the sort!!!
I tell you both curves are due to ADoppler but the velocity curve does not have
the same degree of change. That idea is very simple George.

X = Y/K

It is purely illustrative, drawn as graphs
in Excel and not real data. I just want you to get the idea.
The acceleration is constant for two periods with a raised
joining them. The velocity and radius are just the integrals
of course:

http://www.georgedishman.f2s.com/Hen...lustrative.png

Compare that with this:

http://www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/stupidjerry.jpg

I'm sure you can see that the velocity curve is the same in
both, just inverted. You will find the radius curve matches
that shown in other Cepheid documents we looked at though
I can't find the reference at the moment.

Now tell me, does the luminosity curve he

http://www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/stupidjerry.jpg

match the acceleration (ADoppler) or the velocity (VDoppler)
from he

http://www.georgedishman.f2s.com/Hen...lustrative.png

You're not making sense George. What the hell are those three graphs?
They aren't cepheid curves.

George




www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

Einstein's Relativity - the greatest HOAX since jesus christ's virgin mother.