On May 27, 11:45 pm, "OG" wrote:
"oriel36" wrote in message

ups.com...

On May 26, 2:07 am, "OG" wrote:

There are now enough images along with the original texts to provide
the astronomical basics for a normal audience to understand with
special emphasis in making heliocentric reasoning as enjoyable as I
have found it

As I said
to some extent, yes, what you are saying is true, but only to a very trivial
extent and your obsessive postings about it are not healthy.



Right now there are more than a few people who would like to know what
is going on with global climate and apart from global warming why more
extreme meteorological conditions appear.Understanding global warming
and hemispherical weather patterns (Seasons) involves having a healthy
view of the Earth's motions and how global climate arising from these
motions reduces to the seasons.Presently,the explanation for the
seasons based on a pseudo-dynamic of variable axial tilt or solar
inclination is so unsatisfactory that it approches the level of
untenable.

You want the 17th century analemma hoax based on variable inclination
and it is destroying the ability of men to work with the motions of
the Earth but how these motions mesh with climatological studies.It is
a serious,serious matter beyond the fact that Flamsteed introduced
astrological concepts in heliocentric reasoning and Newton built on
that astrological framework.

I would have no choice but to make the differing conceptions availible
here , even if the reception is hostile ,however I am not disposed to
remain here calling attention to astronomical matters that cannot wait
for people who cannot rise or do not want to rise above magnification
and an astrological framework.It would have been easier to work with
people here on this shared astronomical heritage but obviously you
like that 17th century cartoon creation and there is nothing I can and
would do about it.

Indulge yourselves in your magnification hobby but that is and never
was astronomy proper.