View Single Post
  #7  
Old May 26th 07, 11:13 AM posted to uk.sci.astronomy
oriel36[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,478
Default Bright object in western sky?

On May 26, 2:07 am, "OG" wrote:
"oriel36" wrote in message

ups.com...



On May 24, 10:10 pm, (Richard Tobin) wrote:
In article . com,


oriel36 wrote:
You have the time lapse footage before you and you still defend


I don't need to defend anything, since it isn't being competently
attacked. Everyone in the world - except, apparently, you - can
understand relative motion.


-- Richard


Here you go ,have a good look at the statement that has wrecked the
Copernican insights and try and defend it -


" For to the earth planetary motions appear sometimes direct,
sometimes stationary, nay, and sometimes retrograde. But from the sun
they are always seen direct," Newton


How are you going to derive the Copernican insight that axial rotation
accounts for the daily cycle when you try to account for retrogrades
and orbital motion using a hypothetical observer on the Sun ?.Thats
right you fools,you cannot do it.


Since you are such a pest on this group I think it's reasonable to ask if
you are on medication or similar (regular therapy sessions) for this
obsessive behaviour?

I don't know if you've ever read 'The Sea. The Sea" by Iris Murdoch, but
there is a thread running through it of someone (IIRC) who had a vision
during a LSD trip that recurrs much later in his life.

You do sound very much as though you had a minor revelation during some kind
of psychic trauma that has become obsessional to you. To some extent, yes,
what you are saying is true, but only to a very trivial extent and your
obsessive postings about is are not healthy.
.
I assume you've heard the Beatles song 'The Fool on the Hill'; you seem like
the man who "sees the world spinning 'round", but cannot see that there are
other motions too.


There are now enough images along with the original texts to provide
the astronomical basics for a normal audience to understand with
special emphasis in making heliocentric reasoning as enjoyable as I
have found it

While incredible that nobody here affirms the faster orbital motion
of the inner planets and the slower orbital motion of the outer
planets as seen from an orbitally moving Earth i,it is understandable
given the cult doctrines you adhere to

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ima...2000_tezel.gif

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_fd8O1sk3I

While it will take some time to tidy up the presentation and do all
those things I never really got a chance to do during the astonomical
'construction' phase ,the broad outlines are in place and can now be
framed for people to enjoy.,

You continue with your astrological/magnification exercise.