On May 14, 4:50 am, HW@....(Henri Wilson) wrote:
On 13 May 2007 22:02:56 -0700, Jeff Root wrote:

Henry Wilson replied to Jeff Root:

You still have a problem with "can but not must".
To explore that a bit, I'd like to see if you can match
this intensity curve:

http://www.freemars.org/jeff2/curve1.png

I can...but how do I know you didn't just make it up.

Unless I give you some data that I would rather not, I
guess you can't know for sure. I can only say that I did
not make it up, and that I used a commercial program to
plot the data from a standard data file exactly as I said.

And if I had made it up I don't see what difference that
would make. If you can match the curve, you can match
the curve. If you can't, you can't.

......Jeff Root, guilty of attempted fraud and deception.....

Henri Wilson, known liar, accuses Jeff Root of fraud and deception?
YOU, falsifier of degrees, doctorer of photographs?
YOU, falsifier of quote chains?
YOU, hand-tuner of supposed fits to RT Aurigae?
YOU, who posted a hand-drawn fit to an overcontact binary star?

You yourself recently admitted that your program cannot model
"bumps". Now you claim that you can.
That's yet another lie, obviously.

And of course, you've never been able to accommodate
period noise or amplitude noise.

You can't even model the Algol secondary minimum in multiple
wavelength bands, much less simultaneously fit luminosity and
radial velocity data.

Nor can you model Shapiro delay.

Your count of successful fits stands at ZERO.

Jerry