Jeff Root wrote in news:1179032688.092049.307790
@w5g2000hsg.googlegroups.com:

George replied to Henry:

Individual photons resist ADoppler compression whilst the
macroscopic bunching of all the photons in the beam continues
and is responsible for large brightness variations.

This is really quite a simple principle George. I cannot
understand why you find it so difficult.

Because I learned maths at a more advanced level than
you and can see that your claims are contradictory.

It does appear as if you are ignoring his springy photon
model and applying the math to a different model.

His 'springy photon' model is not viable as it is proposed.
He proposes that the springy photons compress due to pressure from other
photons.

Falsified by experimental data. Wavelength of light is independent of the
intensity of the light. Springy photons would get shorter in wavelength as
light intensity increased.

Perhaps the photons are not springy, perhaps they are like styrofome.
Perhaps they only compress ONCE and stay compressed? Again, not a viable
model. Lasers can start with low output and ramp up their output. Henri's
model would predict strong 'chirp' as the frequency got shorter as
intensity ramped up.

His 'springy BaTh photons' suffer two other problems:
[his model was proposed to handle pulsar pulses and the fact that the phase
of the velocity curve (doppler), the observed phase of Shapiro Effect from
eclipse do not match phase of the doppler and intensity curve predictions
from Henri's BaTh model.
1) space between pulses and pulses must compress by same amount due to one
kind of doppler effect. To get the phase right, Henri has to posit some
kind of compression taking place in different amounts on the space between
pulses(space between photons) and the pulses (photons).
2) The BaTh predicts a inverted Shapiro delay.

Finally, Henri's BaTh still has the problem I have mentioned elsewhere; the
'velocity unification aka extinction' effect that BaTh needs to be at all
viable is so 'unlikely' as to be thermodynamically impossible AND there are
no known mechanisms to accomplish what needs to be accomplished.




--
bz

please pardon my infinite ignorance, the set-of-things-I-do-not-know is an
infinite set.

remove ch100-5 to avoid spam trap