On May 8, 4:24 pm, Phineas T Puddleduck
wrote:
In article .com,

Double-A wrote:
Its a push theory, regardless how you try and model it otherwise... Just
because you've desperately tried to make up new physical sounding words...

You only say that because you still have not been able to get your
mind around the revolutionary concepts of the Wolterian theory.

Point me to the peer-reviewed articles Wolter published.


Socrates never published an article of any kind, and yet he is still
studied in all our major universities. And it's not that things
weren't being published in his day.


Back to your studies, grasshopper.

There is no theory, AA, because it has no mathematical framework, is physically
inconsistent and produces results that are at odds with observed behaviour.


You have been shown compatible math that has been developed, and the
theory is compatible with the math of GR.


So perhaps you and your breathtaking knowledge of physics would like to attack
the 21 questions.....


Those questions were disingenuos. The poster was not truly seeking
answers. Whatever answers had been given, he would have rejected
them.


We both know what you will do of course. Same as when we asked you about the
bigotry of your fellow space cadets...

Run off like the coward you are.

--
Sacred keeper


Now you try to change the subject, and who is "we"?

Double-A