On Mon, 7 May 2007 09:34:38 +0100, "George Dishman"
wrote:


"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 6 May 2007 12:28:36 +0100, "George Dishman"
wrote:
"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
...

http://www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/efdra.jpg

Which part of "match the velocity curve" did you
miss?

The luminosity variations are purely due to the
eclipses so match the velocity knowing your zero
phase corresponds to the eclipse centres and then
alter the distance. For a small value you will get
a match. As you increase the distance and ADoppler
starts to contribute, the first consequence will be
a shift of phase away from the match. As I said
before, you can try changing yaw and eccentricity
but I think you'll find it distorts the sine curve
too quickly to allow a significant amount of ADoppler.

It's OK. It all fits.

Why do you send these stupid posts Henry, you are
just wasting our time. You already know it is out
of phase so it is neither "OK" nor does it "fit".

It fits George..and it all falling into place....

For contact binaries, K is large enough ..

K=1 if your theory is to be self-consistent.

For short period binaries maybe.

K ~10000 for cepheids and other stars.


George




www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

Einstein's Relativity - the greatest HOAX since jesus christ's virgin mother.